<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 162 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68754</link>
    <description>Under Chapter XIV-B, income already reflected in earlier returns and supported by employer records, tax deduction evidence, advance tax, and self-assessment tax payments cannot be treated as undisclosed income merely because a return was filed belatedly; such receipts must be excluded from block assessment. An addition for alleged undisclosed investment based only on a DVO&#039;s estimate of house property alterations was unsustainable where no seized material or contemporaneous evidence linked the expenditure to the block period, and an earlier approved valuer&#039;s report showed the additions were completed before that period. The block assessment was therefore limited to income proved by material evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 162 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68754</link>
      <description>Under Chapter XIV-B, income already reflected in earlier returns and supported by employer records, tax deduction evidence, advance tax, and self-assessment tax payments cannot be treated as undisclosed income merely because a return was filed belatedly; such receipts must be excluded from block assessment. An addition for alleged undisclosed investment based only on a DVO&#039;s estimate of house property alterations was unsustainable where no seized material or contemporaneous evidence linked the expenditure to the block period, and an earlier approved valuer&#039;s report showed the additions were completed before that period. The block assessment was therefore limited to income proved by material evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>