<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 368 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, agreeing that the revised return was invalid and the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found that the original return&#039;s lower income without proper documentation justified the penalty, as the revised income would have been determined under Section 44AD regardless. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 368 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, agreeing that the revised return was invalid and the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found that the original return&#039;s lower income without proper documentation justified the penalty, as the revised income would have been determined under Section 44AD regardless. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>