<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 211 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 15,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the mere surrender of income to purchase peace did not indicate concealment of income. As the Department failed to provide independent evidence proving concealment, the penalty was deemed unjustified and thus cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 211 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 15,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the mere surrender of income to purchase peace did not indicate concealment of income. As the Department failed to provide independent evidence proving concealment, the penalty was deemed unjustified and thus cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>