<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 258 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The trading additions on account of low Gross Profit rate were deleted as the AO failed to provide evidence of income suppression. Deductions under s. 10BA for Duty Entitlement Pass Book and Duty Drawback receipts were allowed, considering them as part of export business profits, in line with the legislative intent of the IT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 258 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The trading additions on account of low Gross Profit rate were deleted as the AO failed to provide evidence of income suppression. Deductions under s. 10BA for Duty Entitlement Pass Book and Duty Drawback receipts were allowed, considering them as part of export business profits, in line with the legislative intent of the IT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>