<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 316 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the order of the learned CIT(A) and holding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s rectification under section 154 was within jurisdiction and justified based on the retrospective amendments. The entire sale proceeds of DEPB were to be considered as income for the purpose of deduction under section 80HHC, and the retrospective amendments were applicable to the assessment year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 316 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the order of the learned CIT(A) and holding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s rectification under section 154 was within jurisdiction and justified based on the retrospective amendments. The entire sale proceeds of DEPB were to be considered as income for the purpose of deduction under section 80HHC, and the retrospective amendments were applicable to the assessment year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>