<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 248 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, sustaining additions only to the extent legally required and partly allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Key points include the reduction of additions for unexplained investment in furniture and excess stock, deletion of additions for unexplained sales and order goods, and corrections made to stock shortage valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:34:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 248 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, sustaining additions only to the extent legally required and partly allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Key points include the reduction of additions for unexplained investment in furniture and excess stock, deletion of additions for unexplained sales and order goods, and corrections made to stock shortage valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>