<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 255 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68672</link>
    <description>For capital gains computation, the Tribunal treated the plot as acquired in 1971 because initial consideration was paid then, possession was given in that year, and later society records and cash book entries supported the original transaction. The subsequent patta, issued later in lieu of earlier documents and the 1971 sale, did not alter the date of acquisition. On that basis, fair market value as on 1 April 1981 was the correct valuation date, not the later patta date of 27 June 1990.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 255 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68672</link>
      <description>For capital gains computation, the Tribunal treated the plot as acquired in 1971 because initial consideration was paid then, possession was given in that year, and later society records and cash book entries supported the original transaction. The subsequent patta, issued later in lieu of earlier documents and the 1971 sale, did not alter the date of acquisition. On that basis, fair market value as on 1 April 1981 was the correct valuation date, not the later patta date of 27 June 1990.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>