<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 393 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reference to the Valuation Cell by the AO was invalid, and the addition of Rs. 2,50,823 on account of assumed cost of acquisition was deleted. Regarding the addition of Rs. 36,870 made under section 68 of the Act for cash credits from two parties, the Tribunal upheld the addition as the assessee failed to establish the necessary conditions under section 68. The appeal was partly allowed, sustaining the addition under section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 393 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reference to the Valuation Cell by the AO was invalid, and the addition of Rs. 2,50,823 on account of assumed cost of acquisition was deleted. Regarding the addition of Rs. 36,870 made under section 68 of the Act for cash credits from two parties, the Tribunal upheld the addition as the assessee failed to establish the necessary conditions under section 68. The appeal was partly allowed, sustaining the addition under section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>