<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 269 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68652</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal by deleting the sustained addition of Rs. 95,000 based on estimated income, undisclosed salary addition, and confirming the deduction for rental income. Additionally, the ITAT directed the credit of the surrendered amount of Rs. 1,35,000, considering the circumstances and lack of concrete evidence supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 269 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68652</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal by deleting the sustained addition of Rs. 95,000 based on estimated income, undisclosed salary addition, and confirming the deduction for rental income. Additionally, the ITAT directed the credit of the surrendered amount of Rs. 1,35,000, considering the circumstances and lack of concrete evidence supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>