<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 266 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of the disallowance of salary payments, the addition for low household withdrawals, and the addition for unexplained cash credits and interest. The Tribunal allowed the shop rent expense, noting its exclusive business use, but upheld the disallowances of shop and traveling expenses due to lack of proper vouchers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 266 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of the disallowance of salary payments, the addition for low household withdrawals, and the addition for unexplained cash credits and interest. The Tribunal allowed the shop rent expense, noting its exclusive business use, but upheld the disallowances of shop and traveling expenses due to lack of proper vouchers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>