<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 271 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the requirement for the AO to record satisfaction before initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The invalidity of the penalty notice and the absence of evidence for conscious concealment of income by the assessee led to the cancellation of the penalty imposed for the assessment year 1988-89.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 271 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the requirement for the AO to record satisfaction before initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The invalidity of the penalty notice and the absence of evidence for conscious concealment of income by the assessee led to the cancellation of the penalty imposed for the assessment year 1988-89.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>