<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 197 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68635</link>
    <description>Protective additions cannot stand where the corresponding substantive block assessment has been quashed as time-barred, because a protective addition is dependent on an existing substantive basis. Once the substantive assessment ceased to exist, the protective addition lost its foundation and could not survive independently. The assessment order was therefore quashed and the appeal succeeded for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 197 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68635</link>
      <description>Protective additions cannot stand where the corresponding substantive block assessment has been quashed as time-barred, because a protective addition is dependent on an existing substantive basis. Once the substantive assessment ceased to exist, the protective addition lost its foundation and could not survive independently. The assessment order was therefore quashed and the appeal succeeded for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>