https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68632 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition under section 69, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The Department failed to substantiate its claim that the transactions were bogus. The assessee provided substantial evidence, including share transaction details and banking records, demonstrating the genuineness of the transactions and investments. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68632 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition under section 69, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The Department failed to substantiate its claim that the transactions were bogus. The assessee provided substantial evidence, including share transaction details and banking records, demonstrating the genuineness of the transactions and investments. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68632