<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 261 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68622</link>
    <description>In block assessment, an addition must be based on seized material or direct evidence, not on presumption, suspicion, or mere estimation. Where a seized loose paper was capable of two explanations and the assessee&#039;s version was supported by the seller&#039;s power of attorney and affidavit, the unexplained investment addition was deleted. Likewise, an estimated addition for undisclosed household expenses based only on a general statement and ad hoc estimate was unsustainable in the absence of seized evidence, especially where the family arrangement and recorded foreign trip expenses supported the assessee. The appeal succeeded on the substantive additions, granting partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 261 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68622</link>
      <description>In block assessment, an addition must be based on seized material or direct evidence, not on presumption, suspicion, or mere estimation. Where a seized loose paper was capable of two explanations and the assessee&#039;s version was supported by the seller&#039;s power of attorney and affidavit, the unexplained investment addition was deleted. Likewise, an estimated addition for undisclosed household expenses based only on a general statement and ad hoc estimate was unsustainable in the absence of seized evidence, especially where the family arrangement and recorded foreign trip expenses supported the assessee. The appeal succeeded on the substantive additions, granting partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>