<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 258 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68617</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal solely for want of appearance by the assessee. It emphasized that the CIT(A) must decide the appeal on merits even without the assessee&#039;s representation. The Tribunal set aside the order, directing a fresh decision by the CIT(A) to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to present their case. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=107011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 258 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68617</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal solely for want of appearance by the assessee. It emphasized that the CIT(A) must decide the appeal on merits even without the assessee&#039;s representation. The Tribunal set aside the order, directing a fresh decision by the CIT(A) to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to present their case. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>