https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68598 The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had disobeyed directions from the High Court by not providing certified copies of documents to the assessee, leading to a lack of opportunity for the assessee to defend against allegations. The AO's actions were deemed contempt of court, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. As a remedy, the Tribunal set aside the assessment orders and directed fresh assessments to be conducted, emphasizing the importance of adhering to court directives to uphold natural justice in tax matters. All appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68598 The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had disobeyed directions from the High Court by not providing certified copies of documents to the assessee, leading to a lack of opportunity for the assessee to defend against allegations. The AO's actions were deemed contempt of court, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. As a remedy, the Tribunal set aside the assessment orders and directed fresh assessments to be conducted, emphasizing the importance of adhering to court directives to uphold natural justice in tax matters. All appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68598