<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 272 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to tax the KBC winnings at the normal rate for the assessment year 2001-02, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It concluded that the Explanation to section 2(24)(ix) was prospective, and the issue was deemed debatable, making it unsuitable for rectification under section 154.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 272 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to tax the KBC winnings at the normal rate for the assessment year 2001-02, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It concluded that the Explanation to section 2(24)(ix) was prospective, and the issue was deemed debatable, making it unsuitable for rectification under section 154.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>