<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 253 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68556</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletions made by the CIT(A) in all disputed issues. The deletions of additions for unexplained deposits in RD account, disallowance of interest-free advance, loss in Gawar split account, suppression of profit in Tumba oil, and undervaluation of stock of Tumba oil were justified based on the facts and circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 253 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68556</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletions made by the CIT(A) in all disputed issues. The deletions of additions for unexplained deposits in RD account, disallowance of interest-free advance, loss in Gawar split account, suppression of profit in Tumba oil, and undervaluation of stock of Tumba oil were justified based on the facts and circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>