<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 283 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that interest under s. 17B of the Wealth Tax Act should only be charged on the amount of tax remaining outstanding after the due date for filing the return, not on the total tax payable. Consequently, the rejection of the assessee&#039;s rectification petition was deemed unjust, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to modify the orders in favor of the assessee, allowing all three appeals. The decision clarified the interpretation of the law and was based on legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 283 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that interest under s. 17B of the Wealth Tax Act should only be charged on the amount of tax remaining outstanding after the due date for filing the return, not on the total tax payable. Consequently, the rejection of the assessee&#039;s rectification petition was deemed unjust, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to modify the orders in favor of the assessee, allowing all three appeals. The decision clarified the interpretation of the law and was based on legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>