<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 326 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68549</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,31,774 for fictitious purchases, agreeing that the AO&#039;s acceptance of sales contradicted the claim of fictitious purchases. The ITAT also supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to set aside the Rs. 24,000 addition for unexplained cash credits, allowing reassessment. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2024 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 326 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68549</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,31,774 for fictitious purchases, agreeing that the AO&#039;s acceptance of sales contradicted the claim of fictitious purchases. The ITAT also supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to set aside the Rs. 24,000 addition for unexplained cash credits, allowing reassessment. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>