<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 332 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions in professional receipts due to insufficient evidence. Assessments for specific years were cancelled as only one addition in professional receipts was made. The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals by Revenue, affirming the lower courts&#039; decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 332 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions in professional receipts due to insufficient evidence. Assessments for specific years were cancelled as only one addition in professional receipts was made. The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals by Revenue, affirming the lower courts&#039; decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>