<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 296 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68535</link>
    <description>Stamp duty valuation cannot, by itself, be treated as the actual sale consideration for computing a deemed gift under the Gift-tax Act where the sale deed records a stated price and there is no evidence of any higher consideration having been received. In the absence of material proving extra consideration, a differential based only on the Sub-Registrar&#039;s stamp duty value does not support an addition as a deemed gift. The deletion of the addition was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 296 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68535</link>
      <description>Stamp duty valuation cannot, by itself, be treated as the actual sale consideration for computing a deemed gift under the Gift-tax Act where the sale deed records a stated price and there is no evidence of any higher consideration having been received. In the absence of material proving extra consideration, a differential based only on the Sub-Registrar&#039;s stamp duty value does not support an addition as a deemed gift. The deletion of the addition was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>