<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 323 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that as the issue regarding the addition forming the basis of the penalty was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration, the penalty could not be upheld. It was determined that fresh penalty proceedings could be initiated if necessary, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 323 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that as the issue regarding the addition forming the basis of the penalty was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration, the penalty could not be upheld. It was determined that fresh penalty proceedings could be initiated if necessary, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>