<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 263 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not follow the correct procedure in levying the penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was imposed in a generalized manner without specific instances of non-compliance cited. It was noted that the assessee had mostly complied with the notices issued. As a result, the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:03:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 263 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not follow the correct procedure in levying the penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was imposed in a generalized manner without specific instances of non-compliance cited. It was noted that the assessee had mostly complied with the notices issued. As a result, the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>