<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 315 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68506</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act was not applicable in this case as the omission to include the minor children&#039;s income was deemed a bona fide mistake made by the counsel preparing the returns. The mistake was promptly rectified upon receiving the notice under Section 147. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:12:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 315 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68506</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act was not applicable in this case as the omission to include the minor children&#039;s income was deemed a bona fide mistake made by the counsel preparing the returns. The mistake was promptly rectified upon receiving the notice under Section 147. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>