<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 349 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Department, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The firm&#039;s registration under section 185(5) was allowed, depreciation claim was upheld, and expenditure against freight receipts was permitted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of judicial discretion and the requirement for reasoned decisions in consideration of the specific circumstances of each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 349 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Department, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The firm&#039;s registration under section 185(5) was allowed, depreciation claim was upheld, and expenditure against freight receipts was permitted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of judicial discretion and the requirement for reasoned decisions in consideration of the specific circumstances of each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>