<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 302 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that no penalty under section 271(1)(c) was applicable to the assessee due to the final assessed loss, citing precedents from Punjab and Haryana High Court and Madras High Court. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 1,47,574 was deleted, and the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 302 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that no penalty under section 271(1)(c) was applicable to the assessee due to the final assessed loss, citing precedents from Punjab and Haryana High Court and Madras High Court. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 1,47,574 was deleted, and the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>