<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 307 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting penalties related to gold and silver ornaments based on ownership explanations and reducing the penalty on unexplained cash. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of providing satisfactory explanations and evidence to support claims during penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 307 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting penalties related to gold and silver ornaments based on ownership explanations and reducing the penalty on unexplained cash. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of providing satisfactory explanations and evidence to support claims during penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>