<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 358 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal. It held that income must be computed based on material seized during the search, not on hypothetical estimations. The Tribunal concluded that the assessment order was timely, as it was within the statutory limitation period following the search initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 358 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal. It held that income must be computed based on material seized during the search, not on hypothetical estimations. The Tribunal concluded that the assessment order was timely, as it was within the statutory limitation period following the search initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>