<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 290 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, concluding that the AO had conducted due inquiries and appropriately applied his mind in classifying the interest income from M/s Wolkem India Ltd. as business income exempt under Section 10B. The Tribunal determined that the CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unjustified, as the AO&#039;s order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:12:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 290 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, concluding that the AO had conducted due inquiries and appropriately applied his mind in classifying the interest income from M/s Wolkem India Ltd. as business income exempt under Section 10B. The Tribunal determined that the CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unjustified, as the AO&#039;s order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>