<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 289 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68482</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed, with deletions of various disallowances and enhancements made by the learned Dy. CIT(A), except for the confirmed disallowance of Rs. 14,910 out of conveyance expenses. The Tribunal found several disallowances and enhancements to be unjustified and deleted them, including disallowances related to expenses on telephone, entertainment, and salary, as well as enhancements related to certain credits in accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 289 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68482</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed, with deletions of various disallowances and enhancements made by the learned Dy. CIT(A), except for the confirmed disallowance of Rs. 14,910 out of conveyance expenses. The Tribunal found several disallowances and enhancements to be unjustified and deleted them, including disallowances related to expenses on telephone, entertainment, and salary, as well as enhancements related to certain credits in accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>