<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 278 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68476</link>
    <description>The appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 1992-93 was partly allowed. The trading addition was deleted as no specific mistakes in book maintenance were identified. The unexplained cash credit issue was restored for fresh consideration to examine agricultural holdings proof and net savings details. Disallowance of travelling expenses was deleted due to business-related nature, while disallowances of vehicle maintenance and telephone expenses were upheld as reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:04:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 278 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68476</link>
      <description>The appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 1992-93 was partly allowed. The trading addition was deleted as no specific mistakes in book maintenance were identified. The unexplained cash credit issue was restored for fresh consideration to examine agricultural holdings proof and net savings details. Disallowance of travelling expenses was deleted due to business-related nature, while disallowances of vehicle maintenance and telephone expenses were upheld as reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>