<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 275 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68472</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions made by the CIT(A) regarding the trading addition, allowance of losses in trading accounts, and deletion of addition due to understatement of closing stock for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal found the deletions by CIT(A) to be justified in all three issues, declining to interfere with the decisions based on the explanations provided by the assessee and the lack of new evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:59:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 275 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68472</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decisions made by the CIT(A) regarding the trading addition, allowance of losses in trading accounts, and deletion of addition due to understatement of closing stock for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal found the deletions by CIT(A) to be justified in all three issues, declining to interfere with the decisions based on the explanations provided by the assessee and the lack of new evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>