<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 271 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68462</link>
    <description>The court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding disputes over additions for surrender of debtors and low household expenses withdrawals. The court found the additions lacked justification and were deemed unreasonable, resulting in their deletion. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed concerning the addition for interest on family deposits, with the court determining the deletion of the addition by the CIT(A) as proper and justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:46:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 271 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68462</link>
      <description>The court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding disputes over additions for surrender of debtors and low household expenses withdrawals. The court found the additions lacked justification and were deemed unreasonable, resulting in their deletion. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed concerning the addition for interest on family deposits, with the court determining the deletion of the addition by the CIT(A) as proper and justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>