<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 347 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 15,000 addition for unexplained NSC investment, as the cash flow statement substantiated the source. Additionally, the Tribunal annulled the Rs. 50,000 income enhancement, ruling that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by enhancing income beyond the original appeal&#039;s scope. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 347 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 15,000 addition for unexplained NSC investment, as the cash flow statement substantiated the source. Additionally, the Tribunal annulled the Rs. 50,000 income enhancement, ruling that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by enhancing income beyond the original appeal&#039;s scope. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>