<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 346 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, making adjustments to disallowed expenses and deleting certain additions. It emphasized the significance of providing proper evidence and clarified the limits of the CIT(A)&#039;s jurisdiction. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s directions for reopening earlier assessments, dismissed the annulment of the assessment order under s. 144A, partially allowed the disallowance of various expenses claimed by the assessee, deleted the addition of unexplained squared up cash credits, and removed the addition on account of household expenses. The Tribunal deemed the CIT(A)&#039;s directions in other cases as academic due to no action taken by the AO under s. 147.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 346 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, making adjustments to disallowed expenses and deleting certain additions. It emphasized the significance of providing proper evidence and clarified the limits of the CIT(A)&#039;s jurisdiction. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s directions for reopening earlier assessments, dismissed the annulment of the assessment order under s. 144A, partially allowed the disallowance of various expenses claimed by the assessee, deleted the addition of unexplained squared up cash credits, and removed the addition on account of household expenses. The Tribunal deemed the CIT(A)&#039;s directions in other cases as academic due to no action taken by the AO under s. 147.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>