<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 305 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68436</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the levy of penal interest under section 201(1A) for the assessment year 1997-98. The Tribunal concluded that the lack of uniformity in tax deduction due to adjustments for excess or deficiency did not warrant penal interest as the tax was deposited correctly, causing no revenue loss. The decision favored the assessee, leading to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 17,350 as penal interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:42:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 305 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68436</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the levy of penal interest under section 201(1A) for the assessment year 1997-98. The Tribunal concluded that the lack of uniformity in tax deduction due to adjustments for excess or deficiency did not warrant penal interest as the tax was deposited correctly, causing no revenue loss. The decision favored the assessee, leading to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 17,350 as penal interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>