<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 256 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68435</link>
    <description>Stamp duty valuation fixed by the Sub-Registrar could not, by itself, be treated as the property&#039;s market value for attracting a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. A stamp duty assessment serves only the limited purpose of levy and does not establish actual market value. Because the transfer was for declared consideration and the Revenue produced no independent material showing that the assessee received more than that amount, the burden to prove a deemed gift was not discharged. No deemed gift was exigible on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 256 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68435</link>
      <description>Stamp duty valuation fixed by the Sub-Registrar could not, by itself, be treated as the property&#039;s market value for attracting a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. A stamp duty assessment serves only the limited purpose of levy and does not establish actual market value. Because the transfer was for declared consideration and the Revenue produced no independent material showing that the assessee received more than that amount, the burden to prove a deemed gift was not discharged. No deemed gift was exigible on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>