<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 339 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68421</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the cross-objection filed by the assessee. The deletion of trading addition of Rs. 54,496 and addition of Rs. 2,52,846 made on account of short stock found at the time of survey were both deleted due to lack of concrete evidence. The disallowance of Rs. 3,000 for office expenses was set aside, as no specific justification was provided. However, the disallowance of Rs. 1,500 for travelling expenses was upheld by the ITAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:37:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 339 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68421</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the cross-objection filed by the assessee. The deletion of trading addition of Rs. 54,496 and addition of Rs. 2,52,846 made on account of short stock found at the time of survey were both deleted due to lack of concrete evidence. The disallowance of Rs. 3,000 for office expenses was set aside, as no specific justification was provided. However, the disallowance of Rs. 1,500 for travelling expenses was upheld by the ITAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>