<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 313 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68409</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow relief of Rs. 1,00,000, emphasizing the AO&#039;s failure to consider interest claimed in the P&amp;amp;L account and make a fair income estimate. The tribunal found the AO&#039;s income estimation excessive and unreasonable, upholding the relief granted by the CIT(A). The assessee&#039;s cross-objection supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was deemed infructuous as the tribunal dismissed it along with the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 313 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68409</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow relief of Rs. 1,00,000, emphasizing the AO&#039;s failure to consider interest claimed in the P&amp;amp;L account and make a fair income estimate. The tribunal found the AO&#039;s income estimation excessive and unreasonable, upholding the relief granted by the CIT(A). The assessee&#039;s cross-objection supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was deemed infructuous as the tribunal dismissed it along with the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>