<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 320 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68406</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271B of the IT Act, 1961 for failure to produce an audit report under section 44AB on time. The tribunal considered the circumstances where the audit report was obtained within the deadline but submitted late due to the assessee&#039;s misunderstanding regarding filing obligations under VDIS. Referring to Circular No. 755, the tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed for technical reasons and upheld that the delay was justified. Thus, the penalty was canceled, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 1997-98.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 320 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68406</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271B of the IT Act, 1961 for failure to produce an audit report under section 44AB on time. The tribunal considered the circumstances where the audit report was obtained within the deadline but submitted late due to the assessee&#039;s misunderstanding regarding filing obligations under VDIS. Referring to Circular No. 755, the tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed for technical reasons and upheld that the delay was justified. Thus, the penalty was canceled, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 1997-98.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>