<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 240 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68391</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed. The addition of Rs. 5,98,440 was partially upheld, with the income related to the two vehicles owned by the assessee being assessable, while the income related to the three vehicles not owned by the assessee was deleted. The Third Member&#039;s decision provided a balanced resolution, taking into account the ownership of vehicles and the validity of the partners&#039; statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 240 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68391</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed. The addition of Rs. 5,98,440 was partially upheld, with the income related to the two vehicles owned by the assessee being assessable, while the income related to the three vehicles not owned by the assessee was deleted. The Third Member&#039;s decision provided a balanced resolution, taking into account the ownership of vehicles and the validity of the partners&#039; statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>