<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 259 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the IT Act. It was held that the Valuation Officer&#039;s report obtained after the original assessments could not be used as a basis for reassessment, in line with established judicial precedents emphasizing that such reports are opinions and not substantive grounds for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:10:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 259 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the IT Act. It was held that the Valuation Officer&#039;s report obtained after the original assessments could not be used as a basis for reassessment, in line with established judicial precedents emphasizing that such reports are opinions and not substantive grounds for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>