<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 295 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that penalties under sections 271D and 271E for the assessment years 1993-94, 1994-95, and 1995-96 were time-barred under section 275(1)(c) due to reasonable cause. The penalties were found not sustainable as they were initiated beyond the prescribed limitation period. Consequently, all appeals by the assessee were allowed, while all appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 295 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that penalties under sections 271D and 271E for the assessment years 1993-94, 1994-95, and 1995-96 were time-barred under section 275(1)(c) due to reasonable cause. The penalties were found not sustainable as they were initiated beyond the prescribed limitation period. Consequently, all appeals by the assessee were allowed, while all appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>