<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 170 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68348</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal in part, directing the AO to consider the appellant as a registered firm for the year under consideration. The ITAT also instructed the AO to delete additions in diesel and petrol accounts due to insufficient justification, and in the oil account as the disallowance was deemed an attempt to manipulate trading results. While tent expenses were allowed based on verifiable bills, telephone expenses disallowance was upheld due to lack of arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:53:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 170 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68348</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal in part, directing the AO to consider the appellant as a registered firm for the year under consideration. The ITAT also instructed the AO to delete additions in diesel and petrol accounts due to insufficient justification, and in the oil account as the disallowance was deemed an attempt to manipulate trading results. While tent expenses were allowed based on verifiable bills, telephone expenses disallowance was upheld due to lack of arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>