<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 166 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68342</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance of interest expenditure related to an interest-free loan was overturned as the Tribunal found no nexus between borrowed funds and the advance. However, disallowances of various office expenses were upheld due to perceived personal elements. The disallowance of ESI expenses was reversed as the entire amount was paid from the company&#039;s funds with no employee contributions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 166 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68342</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The disallowance of interest expenditure related to an interest-free loan was overturned as the Tribunal found no nexus between borrowed funds and the advance. However, disallowances of various office expenses were upheld due to perceived personal elements. The disallowance of ESI expenses was reversed as the entire amount was paid from the company&#039;s funds with no employee contributions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>