https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68337 The appeal challenged trading addition, disallowance of motor vehicle expenses, and telephone expenses. The Tribunal concluded that the trading addition was not justified and deleted it. The disallowance for motor vehicle expenses was found somewhat excessive and reduced to one-fourth of the claim, while the disallowance for telephone expenses was upheld. General grounds did not require a specific decision. The appeal was allowed in part, with the trading addition being deleted and the disallowance for motor vehicle expenses reduced, while the disallowance for telephone expenses was upheld. en-us Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:20:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68337 The appeal challenged trading addition, disallowance of motor vehicle expenses, and telephone expenses. The Tribunal concluded that the trading addition was not justified and deleted it. The disallowance for motor vehicle expenses was found somewhat excessive and reduced to one-fourth of the claim, while the disallowance for telephone expenses was upheld. General grounds did not require a specific decision. The appeal was allowed in part, with the trading addition being deleted and the disallowance for motor vehicle expenses reduced, while the disallowance for telephone expenses was upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68337