<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 158 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68336</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, ruling that the addition of unexplained capital to the declared income was not valid as the opening capital was verifiable and the Assessing Officer could not make additions without disturbing the previous year&#039;s final assessment. The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the declared income, ultimately leading to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 40,152 as unexplained capital for the assessment year 1991-92.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:19:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 158 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68336</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, ruling that the addition of unexplained capital to the declared income was not valid as the opening capital was verifiable and the Assessing Officer could not make additions without disturbing the previous year&#039;s final assessment. The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the declared income, ultimately leading to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 40,152 as unexplained capital for the assessment year 1991-92.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>