<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 202 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the declared income from the contract business, considering the unpaid claim for extra work and the hybrid accounting system followed by the assessee. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation, in line with the Rajasthan High Court&#039;s judgment and the relevant circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:10:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 202 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the declared income from the contract business, considering the unpaid claim for extra work and the hybrid accounting system followed by the assessee. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation, in line with the Rajasthan High Court&#039;s judgment and the relevant circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>