<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 312 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, by majority decision, deleted the additions of Rs. 1,50,000 and Rs. 3,00,000 as unexplained investments under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the penalty of Rs. 9,50,000 imposed under Section 271D. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by the assessee&#039;s explanations and the reasonable cause for the actions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and emphasizing the genuineness of the financial dealings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 312 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, by majority decision, deleted the additions of Rs. 1,50,000 and Rs. 3,00,000 as unexplained investments under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the penalty of Rs. 9,50,000 imposed under Section 271D. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by the assessee&#039;s explanations and the reasonable cause for the actions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and emphasizing the genuineness of the financial dealings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>